Lithium Craze: Comparing Arianne Phosphate To Top Companies

–News Direct–

By Meg Flippin, Benzinga

From powering electric vehicles to storing solar and wind energy, lithium plays a critical role in the transition to a greener world. So its not surprising demand for Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LFP) batteries is exploding as are the market values of its key publicly traded producers.

With energy and food prices still high and weather-related calamities occurring far too often, everyone from companies to consumers is looking for greener alternatives across the board. Electric vehicles have driven a lot of the demand, but lithium is also used in storing captured wind and solar for the power grid and residential solar power systems.

LFPs Gaining Traction

For years, North American EV makers relied on lithium-ion batteries made of lithium, cobalt and nickel to power this greener vision. But cobalt and nickel are scarce and expensive not to mention controversial.

Companies looking for an alternative have turned to LFPs. These batteries are highly stable, longer lasting, and more resistant to heat degradation. They also require less lithium.

In 2022, about 737,000 tons of lithium was produced globally. Thats expected to increase to 964,000 tons in 2023, reaching 1.17 million tons by 2024. The LFP market is projected to exceed $50 billion by 2023. And, in a recent report, Wood Mackenzie predicted that lithium iron phosphate will become the leading battery chemistry for EVs by 2028.

Beyond EVs, theres another big opportunity for LFPs: energy storage systems and powerwalls. These are designed to store energy from solar or the grid to be used later. Some are portable while others are connected. Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) is increasingly using LFPs in its energy storage products, which bodes well for the industry.

Northern Exposure

Evidently, this isnt lost on investors, and many investors are watching publicly traded lithium companies keenly. Some of the key players include Albemarle Corp. (NYSE: ALB), Sociedad Qumica y Minera S.A. (NYSE: SQM), Ganfeng Lithium Co., Ltd. (OTCMKTS: GNENF) and Mineral Resources Ltd. (OTCMKTS: MALRY).

But they arent cheap. Albemarle currently trades at around $168 per share. In dollar terms, thats more expensive than General Motors (NYSE: GM), Ford (NYSE: F), and even Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN). Meanwhile, SQM sports a $15.85 billion market valuation.

Fortunately, there are cheaper ways to get exposure to the lithium battery market, such as through the miners that provide the minerals needed to make batteries. Arianne Phosphate (OTCMKTS: DRRSF), one such company hailing from Quebec, Canada, provides a key ingredient for LFP batteries and is cheaper than the aforementioned lithium stocks in dollar terms.

But, as its phosphate is snapped up by producers of everything from EVs to solar storage systems, that may not be the case for long.

Deposits Set it Apart

Ariannes Lac Paul project in Quebec could become a key resource for manufacturers. The geology of the deposit is igneous and thus very rare, with less than 10% of all phosphate coming from ore bodies of this nature. Ariannes deposit can produce a purer concentrate, higher than over 90% of the worlds phosphate. Further, aside from the phosphate content, Arianne reports that its deposit does not have any issues with deleterious elements (radioactive, heavy-metal) that are found in most of the worlds phosphates. From an ESG perspective, Ariannes mine also adheres to strict environmental, social and corporate standards that set it aside from most other deposits.

There is also pro-mining legislation that helps companies like Arianne. The White Houses American Battery Materials Initiative is aimed at securing a reliable and sustainable supply of critical minerals used for power, electricity, and EVs. Meanwhile, the Department of Energy is awarding $2.8 billion from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill to boost domestic manufacturing. Lastly, Quebec has shown itself to be aggressive in attracting and advancing battery initiatives and is expected to play a significant role in Ariannes advancement.

Judging by how the market is moving, LFPs could well be the future. A cheaper way to play this exploding market is with phosphate, of which Arianne appears to be a well-positioned producer.

ARIANNE PHOSPHATE INC. ( owns the Lac Paul phosphate deposit in Quebec, Canada. Fully permitted and shovel ready, the asset is among the worlds largest greenfield deposits, capable of producing an environmentally friendly phosphate concentrate. Due to the nature of its high-purity, low-contaminant product, Ariannes phosphate can be used to produce fertilizer as well as meeting the technical requirements of specialty applications such as the lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) battery. The Lac Paul deposit is rare due to its geographic location and geological structure. Arianne Phosphate is listed on both the TSX-V: DAN and the OTCQX: DRRSF.

This post contains sponsored advertising content. This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be investing advice.

This information contains forward looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein, including without limitation, statements regarding potential mineralisation and reserves, exploration results and future plans and objectives of Arianne Phosphate Inc, are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Arianne Phosphate Incs (Arianne Phosphate or the Company) expectations are disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in Arianne Phosphate Incs documents filed from time-to-time with the TSX Venture and other regulatory authorities.

Contact Details

Brian Ostroff, President

Company Website

View source version on

Arianne Phosphate

comtex tracking


About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Feature Georgia Heralds was involved in the writing and production of this article.